The QSFP+ transceiver comparison

For QSFP+ formfactor there are different variants. I did a comparison of the optical ones - February 2014 - updated March 2018: (without Active-Optical-Cables and Direct-Attached-Cables)
QSFP+ WITH LC QSFP+ WITH MTP/MPO
QSFP-Plus-CWDM-40-Gigabit-SM-1310nm-10km-DDM-DOM-300x212.jpg.pagespeed.ce.L4U5ekCoe1 QSFP-Plus-LR4-40-Gigabit-SM-1310nm-10km-DDM-DOM-300x212.jpg.pagespeed.ce.JVnMh4Q3N2
The main difference between Q.1640G.x and Q.85/1340G.x is the connector type. QSFP+ like Q.1640G.x do have an integrated CWDM Mux/Demux which multiplexes all 4 lanes to only one fiber. This gives the ability to use a LC-Duplex connector with a standard Multimode- or Singlemode-Fiber.
Some nomenclatures like LM4, LX4, IR4 are really confusing. Let me explain in short:
  • LM4: Is long-range Multimode (100-140m OM3 / up to 160m on OM4)
  • IR4: Is 2km on Singlemode
  • LX4: Combines both - 2km Singlemode and 100-160m Multimode
QSFP+ with MTP/MPO connector are more price sensitive. There is just a cabling with MTP/MPO cables needed.
Description/ Connector Distance Wavelength Connector Details Interoperability Provider
QSFP+ SR4 100m (OM3) 150m (OM4) 4 x 850nm MTP/MPO IEEE 802.3ba (40GBASE-SR4) QSFP+ extended SR4
SFP+ SR
Flexoptix Q.8540G.02
Cisco QSFP-40G-SR4
Juniper QFX-QSFP-40GE-SR4
Arista 40GBASE-SR4
Brocade 40G-QSFP-SR4*
QSFP+ eSR4 300m (OM3)
400m (OM4)
4 x 850nm MTP/MPO optimized VCSEL with better performance of RMS spectral width compared with QSFP+ SR4 QSFP+ SR4
SFP+ SR
Flexoptix Q.8540G.03
Juniper QFX-QSFP-40GE-ESR4*
Arista 40GBASE-XSR4
QSFP+ LX4 150m (OM3)
160m (OM4)
1270nm, 1290nm, 1310nm, 1330nm LC Multimode optimized
4-Kanal CWDM Mux/Demux inside
Flexoptix Q.1640G.03
Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LX4
QSFP+ BIDI SR 100m (OM3)
120m (OM4)
1 x 850nm
1 x 900nm
LC BIDI for Multimode is hot!
20G per lambda!
only available from Cisco at the moment Cisco QSFP-40G-SR-BD
QSFP+ IR4 1km (G.652) 1270nm, 1290nm, 1310nm, 1330nm LC 4-Channel CWDM Mux/Demux inside SFP+ CWDM Flexoptix Q.1640G.2
Arista 40GBASE-LRL4
Juniper JNP-QSFP-40GE-IR4
QSFP+ LR4 10km (G.652) 1270nm, 1290nm, 1310nm, 1330nm LC IEEE 802.3ba (40GBASE-LR4)
4-Channel CWDM Mux/Demux inside
SFP+ CWDM Flexoptix Q.1640G.10
Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4
Cisco QSFP-40G-LR
Arista 40GBASE-LR4
Brocade 40G-QSFP-LR4
QSFP+ LR4 10km (G.652) 1270nm, 1290nm, 1310nm, 1330nm LC IEEE 802.3ba (40GBASE-LR4)
4-Channel CWDM Mux/Demux inside
SFP+ CWDM Flexoptix Q.1640G.20
QSFP+ ER4 30km (G.652) 1270nm, 1290nm, 1310nm, 1330nm LC IEEE 802.3ba (40GBASE-ER4) SFP+ CWDM Flexoptix Q.1640G.40
QSFP+ PIR4 1km (G.652) 4 x 1310nm MTP/MPO APC 4 x 10G operations on SMF QSFP+ parallel LR4 SFP+ LR Flexoptix Q.1340G.2
Arista 40GBASE-PLRL4
Juniper JNP-QSFP-4x10GE-IR
QSFP+ PLR4 10km (G.652) 4 x 1310nm MTP/MPO APC 4 x 10G operations on SMF QSFP+ short parallel LR4
SFP+ LR
Flexoptix Q.1340G.10
Arista 40G-PLR4
Note: a QSFP+ LR4 is interoperable with a QSFP+ LR4. I didn't mention this in the columen "interoperability" for a better overview. This applies to all other types as well.
* Juniper enables for their QFX-QSFP-40GE-ESR4 also 4 x 10G operations - to split up one QSFP+ port in 4 dedicated 10G ports (credits go to Tom Eichhorn for working tirelessly on the QFX tests). The same applies for Brocade. For this kind of operation they defined a special article/partnumber 40G-QSFP-SR4-INT. From a technical point of view this "split operation" is possible with all QSFP+ mentioned above. QSFP+ get always 4 x 10G from the host on the electrical side. Only the programming of the transceiver needs to be adapted for the host. On the optical path you have to check how to split up the signal in 4 dedicated 10G lines. For the ones with MTP/MPO receptacle this is not a problem with  Breakout-cables.
 
Only registered users can post comments. Please Sign in or create an account